Reputation to Revenue

HP backs solutions rhetoric with org change and investments

 

Everyone talks about "solutions" these days but few seem to invest in the changes necessary to move beyond the rhetoric. For example, truly developing, marketing, and selling integrated B2B solutions typically requires both a strong focus from the top down and a new alignment from the bottom up.

Far too often, companies talk the solutions talk but fail to walk the walk. They don't invest in new mechanisms to work across business units, new ways to connect with customers, and new skills for selling higher value offerings. As a result, we see companies promoting "solutions" that are really just bundles of existing products and services, launching marketing programs that neglect real customer needs, and falling back on the old feature-function approach to sales that customers long ago rejected.

Walking the Walk

Organizational initiatives at HP over the last several years suggest that the IT giant is indeed walking the solutions walk. HP has developed and sold enterprise IT solutions for years but a renewed push in 2009 led to a much sharper focus on 10 critical areas of business customer need, such as enterprise security, converged IT infrastructure, and application transformation.

As Magdy Assem, Senior Director of Enterprise Solutions Marketing, explained:

"Not everything is a solution. You have to look outside-in to really understand the key areas to highlight. HP and other big tech companies all have tens of thousands of products and even so-called solutions. But you need to know what matters to clients. What keeps them up at night? Then you can focus new resources on these areas, not on everything, and create integrated offerings to address those needs at a higher level rather than just selling a bunch of products."

Customer focus and integrated offerings are critical steps for solutions but perhaps even more impressive are the organizational changes that HP has made to invest in success. "This is a key point for solutions," according to Assem:

"We've been working on solutions for years but you need to go beyond just aligning the organization and actually put a structure in place and hold it accountable. We've done this in sales, in field marketing, and in solutions planning and marketing. These are stand-alone teams that are not part of any product team. This was a big 'aha' for us."

New Organizational Investments

On the sales side, HP has added a new layer of Account General Managers for its top global accounts to serve as leaders in positioning and selling integrated solutions. Instead of just adding incentives for existing teams to sell higher value solutions, the new structure reflects an understanding that companies like HP need senior level sellers to be solely focused on meeting customers' most important business needs.

"To drive growth, we need to sell HP, not just one or two products," says Assem. "This means we have to elevate the discussion and have a business dialogue. You want the top people from the sales organization focusing on the highest value solutions. They can then bring in all the product specialists when they need them."

Along with the new global account leaders in sales, HP has also invested in a substantial sales education and training effort to strengthen the bias toward solutions. This has included the creation of HP Sales University, reorganizing the annual sales kickoff, rethinking training programs, and refreshing sales education curricula to include monthly activities focused on solutions.

Beyond sales, HP has also added new solutions marketing groups in the field to support the new push in the Americas, Europe, and Asia-Pacific. "You can't just align the product groups around solutions," according to Assem. "It won't work. You need dedicated people on the larger solution issues so we've added new teams headed by a VP for solutions marketing in each region."

Finally, at the corporate level, HP has added a new team for solutions marketing which Assem himself leads. The team's mandate is to define the key areas of solutions focus, develop and support key offerings, and work with marketing and sales teams across HP's business units and regions to bring solutions to market. The team includes dedicated specialists for each of the 10 major solution areas.

Overall, "this has been a huge investment to address customer needs and drive growth," says Assem. "We needed new skill sets to complement existing skills so we've done a lot of hiring and a lot of shifting within marketing and sales. Ultimately, finding people with business skills and teaching them the technology is a better route to solutions leadership than the other way around."

Return on Investment

Assem is quick to suggest that HP still has a way to go with enterprise solutions, and that the journey thus far has not been painless. "Building bridges and alignment across the organization is always a challenge," he notes. "You can't just add separate new groups or you'll risk duplicating efforts and losing support. And you really have to earn respect. It's never easy telling people a new way when they have been doing this for a living for many years."

Less than two years into the new push, however, Assem can see substantial ROI in three major areas: Average deal size has increased significantly with our global accounts and that's a key metric. We've also seen revenue growth in general with these accounts. Third, we have seen real growth in the solutions portion of the pipeline, which is another key metric for us."

Clearly not every company has HP's deep pockets. But the larger point holds for any organization looking to sell complex, high value solutions: If you really want to talk the walk, you're likely going to have to invest in new people, skills, and teams to move from rhetoric to reality. HP's investments in new groups within corporate and field marketing as well as sales help point the way forward.

What about you? How are you investing in people and organization to grow your solutions business. Please let me know in the comments.

 

Sustainability best practices can guide social media too

Jon Hampson, Environment Director, for Capgemini UK, gave a great presentation last week on the top lessons for building sustainability programs at large corporations. Listening to Hampson recount the impressive strides Capgemini has made in reducing the company's environmental impact, though, I couldn't help but think about how relevant his lessons were for B2B social media, as well.

Focus on what matters. For Capgemini, reducing energy consumption in data centers and cutting back on business travel has proved far more consequential than other popular ideas like recycling and printing on both sides of paper. The latter are fine, but effective programs select a few priority areas, set substantial concrete objectives, and put aside the rest. As Hampson notes: "Lots of companies flounder with this, think they have to do everything even if impact is low or not  aligned to major business objectives."

Social media is similar. B2B companies anxious to get started in social media often get caught up in the tools and tactics of disseminating content and building follower lists. These have their place, and what matters most will certainly vary across companies. By and large, however, what does matter most to B2B firms is using social media to deepen customer and market insight, improve internal collaboration, and strengthen engagement and trust with key customers and partners. 

Build the business case and continually refresh it. For Capgemini, sustainability is not a nice-to-have program that makes people feel good; it's a commercial imperative with substantial business impact and potential. As Hampson notes, the business case for sustainability builds directly on key corporate priorities, including access to critical resources and markets, operational efficiency, legal and regulatory compliance, and competitive differentiation. As the particulars within these priorities evolve, and sustainability initiatives move forward, Hampson and his team adjust and refine the business case accordingly.

With social media, the business case should similarly be a work in progress rooted in core business priorities. Marketers investing in social media often focus on building awareness, demonstrating thought leadership, and (if at all possible), generating new leads. If "what matters" includes improving business agility, collaboration, and connection, though, these should be central to the business case with clear objectives and metrics (even if not financial) to support that case.

Leverage financial processes, baseline early...and manage expectations. Hampson made several great points here, including the data intensity and complexity of the issues, the importance of getting the CFO on board with a major new initiative, the inevitability of gaps and inaccuracies in the data, the need to make assumptions and be transparent about them, and the critical importance of measurable quick wins to build momentum.

The lessons make eminent sense for social media. Social media initiatives are not typically very expensive in terms of cash, but aligning with the CFO and emphasizing financial management and impacts is always a good idea, even if the results are not entirely measurable in dollars and cents. Managing expectations is also essential. Social media is a long-term game; few companies see substantial gains to the top or bottom line until they are well along with new ways of working. Yet quick wins are certainly possible, especially in areas including market insight, internal collaboration, and customer engagement. 

Integrate and hold your nerve. Sustainability is about business transformation, Hampson said, rather than just another side issue or additional program. You don't want to create parallel processes; you want to transform existing processes and programs. This means engaging and empowering leaders and experts across the organization rather than doing  it all yourself; it also means that active education and ongoing support for changing behavior is at least as important as new technology and tools.

Ideally, social media is really social business. It's also about transforming how companies work -- which certainly means that broad-based engagement and empowerment is critical rather than simply setting up a separate group to "do" social media. The leaders in social media have moved far beyond a few staff and programs in the last few years and invested heavily in social media training, centers of excellence to document and share guidelines and best practice, and active support for integrated action and culture change. 

Make your reporting count. Interestingly, Hampson noted that his big lesson about sustainability reporting was that telling Capgemini's story out in the marketplace was just the tip of a fast-growing iceberg. The real need is internal, and reporting internally has become a huge effort. Most important on the internal front is tailoring reports for key stakeholders, providing actionable insight (not just data), and actively targeting the most important people and groups.

Given the complexity and rapid change of social media, as well as the generally long term nature of social business change, careful and aggressive internal reporting is also essential. Different stakeholders have quite different perspectives on how social media can help their aspect of the business; tailoring reporting to ensure relevance can go a long way toward constructive engagement across diverse groups and functions. And of course focusing on actionable insight (e.g., market feedback suggests we need much more effective value propositions) is a great deal more useful than simple data (e.g., our latest Facebook push yielded 2,000 new fans).

Hampson's lessons are actually useful for most any major change initiative. As we all look toward getting much more effective with social media, though, they seem to provide a useful guide to moving forward in the most productive possible way.

Do you agree? What are your top five lessons learned?

Photo by Kyle MacKenzie.

The four engines of B2B marketing success

A friend recently had the good fortune not only to take over marketing for a successful B2B firm, but to do so with a mandate to build a new strategy that ensures a much greater impact on the business.

He's a bit like a kid in a candy store: he's got budget to spend, executive support for a more ambitious marketing program, and a relatively clean slate upon which to draw the new strategy. 

The existing program has been pretty traditional, focusing mostly on collateral, events, advertising, and direct support for the sales team. He knows that's not enough, and is definitely interested in doing more with thought leadership and social media, but how best to reshape the overall strategy is not entirely clear.

Asked for some advice, I agreed with a stronger emphasis on thought leadership and social media (which I think are appropriate for all B2B  firms), and I questioned the value of putting so much energy into advertising and collateral. 

More generally, though, I suggested that the strategy focus on the four marketing engines that I think all B2B firms need to have running smoothly to ensure business success.

Four Engines for B2B Marketing Success 

Content Engine:

As the need for more and better content continues to grow, marketing leaders have realized that they need an integrated "content engine" that consistently produces compelling content for every stage of the buying cycle. This includes thought leadership content to help build reputation and interest, educational content to support lead generation and nurturing, solutions and customer success content to support sales conversations, and, of course, social media content to support ongoing connections with customers and others.

Relationship Engine:

B2B marketing rises and falls on the strength of the company's relationships with customers, prospects, partners, and market influencers. For many marketing organizations, though, the objective of building, strengthening, and sustaining key relationships has no clear owner or strategy. A "relationship engine" may sound awkward but the idea is to ensure a comprehensive, consistent, and focused approach to strengthening critical stakeholder connections to increase sales, loyalty, and market insight. This should work across such areas as events, customer councils, account management, references, and social media.

Lead Development Engine:

The increasingly long and convoluted purchase processes that B2B marketers face puts a premium on well organized systems for lead nurturing and management. No longer can we focus on just the early stages of generating leads and then throw them over the wall to sales. More and more, we need to stay in the game with longer term programs to develop and sustain opportunities in close coordination with sales. Content and relationship programs contribute substantially to this effort but someone also needs to own the overall system for lead development, including qualification, scoring, nurturing, and assessment.

Solutions Development Engine:

Like many B2B companies, my friend's firm has a long history of successful products, satisfied customers, and productive partners. At the same time, also like many B2B companies, his firm is feeling the heat from increasing competition, margin squeeze on products, and buying decisions moving higher up in their customers' organizations. The result is a need for higher value solutions that respond more specifically to individual customer needs. Doing this efficiently and effectively means moving past the one-off approach based solely in the field. Instead, marketing needs to guide and support the field in determining top priorities for new offer development, crafting the right value propositions, and routinizing the process with the right stage gates and metrics.

The four engines don't cover every last aspect of B2B marketing, but they come pretty close and they provide a clear framework for building a comprehensive strategy that balances short- and longer-term success. Get each of the engines humming smoothly and results are sure to follow.

What do you think? Am I missing something important? Are all of your engines in good working order?

Photo credit: Imnop88a

Four steps to strengthening B2B customer connections

 

IBM's hot-off-the-press 2010 CEO Study confirms again what solutions marketers already know: getting closer to customers is a strategic priority. An overwhelming 88% of large enterprise CEOs told IBM that getting closer to customers is a top business strategy for the next five years, placing it at the top of the list. An even higher number of the best performing CEOs, 95%, stressed the point.  

Is this really news? Isn't this just Marketing 101?

Well, sort of. The idea is basic, but making it happen, especially in large organizations, is not so easy.

The CEO imperative makes sense. Big company CEOs are struggling mightily, as the IBM report notes, with "the complexity of operating in an increasingly volatile and uncertain world."

In this context, and especially from a B2B perspective, close customer connections are essential to:

• Gain deep insight into customer wants and needs
• Gather input and advice on potential new offerings
• Uncover new opportunities and co-create solutions
• Obtain references, testimonials, and proof of value delivered

Creating and sustaining those trusted connections is extremely difficult, though, when our customers are overwhelmed with their own professional demands and tune out most of our marketing.

Social media brings promise of new and potentially more effective ways to build and maintain vibrant customer connections, both individual and communal -- but understanding how to turn that promise into reality is far from clear.

Meanwhile, face-to-face connections remain essential for key customers, especially at the executive level where so many of us need to be working. But our sales people have less time for relationship building and often little credibility in the executive suite. Beyond sales, it is difficult to know which face-to-face programs are worth funding.

A final challenge, especially for large organizations, is simply managing, coordinating, and building synergies across the wide range of programs and activities designed to strengthen customer connections.

Knowing this is a CEO priority, however, should make it at least a bit easier for marketing leaders to push forward with efforts to do what we all know is so important.

Here are four steps to consider:

1. Do an assessment. It's hard to even keep track of all the ways we're already connecting with customers. Research, sales, services, and delivery are obvious, but we also have thought leadership programs, social media and networks, executive relationship programs, reference management, key account management, customer councils, collaborative solutions development, and probably many more. Take stock of all these initiatives. Look at funding and staffing. Review effectiveness in terms of customer insight and relationship growth. Benchmark the competition. We need a baseline to identify gaps and next steps and to help build a vision of where we need to go.
2. Put someone in charge and build a cross-organizational team. We're already doing this with social media (hopefully!), but customer connections is an even bigger deal. We need someone with the big picture in mind and organizational partners and resources available to improve coordination, integration, and information sharing. We're not building relationships for their own sake, and we're not doing it just for sales either. If no one has accountability to ensure efficiency and effectiveness across the range of relationship-oriented programs, it won't happen.
3. Build executive commitment. The CEO wants to get closer to customers but is the rest of the leadership group on board? Are they setting the right examples and the right tone for their teams? Operationalizing the commitment to customer connections requires real investment and, as important, TIME. We need to push and prod and support senior executives to make the time to work on key relationships, participate in customer councils, and send the message that these initiatives are indeed a top priority.
4. Provide incentives. Companies that take customer satisfaction seriously put serious incentives in place to support the right behavior. Improving customer satisfaction is not the same thing as strengthening customer connections and relationships, but the principle certainly applies (as it usually does with any strategic initiative). Set specific goals, measure results, and then reward the folks in marketing, sales, service, and delivery teams for hitting their relationship growth targets.

What would you add to the list? What's working for you?

Photo credit: Marc_Smith

Lessons from IBM's CIO community program

Everyone selling high value solutions wants to engage C-level executives. 

They're the ultimate decision makers. They can provide deep insight into both their own companies and emerging issues in your markets. They can give you the most powerful references and testimonials. 

Of course they're also the hardest to reach. 

Most B2B solution providers have some sort of executive relationship program, often with some combination of advisory councils, executive briefing centers, executive dinners and seminars, and similar initiatives. And most of these companies struggle mightily to make these programs work and gain substantial value from them.

Karla Bousquet, Director of Executive Client Marketing at IBM, provided some useful insight from IBM's experience during a webinar today organized by Farland Group (full disclosure: I used to work with Farland Group principals when we were all at Truman Company).

Most important, according to Bousquet, is beginning with a clear understanding of what senior executives (CIOs, in this case) truly value:

• Engaging with their peers and extending their professional networks
• Influencing the direction of organizations or initiatives that are important to them
• Gaining justification for their business direction and intuition
• Sharing best practices and lessons learned from peers and experts they trust

They're busy, they don't really care about your products, but they are anxious to learn and grow, most especially with their peers.  

In this context, IBM has taken a strong community approach to serve CIO (and IBM) needs, with four core objectives:

• Establish a shared agenda for engaging with peers and influencing IBM's strategy
• Deliver on IBM's belief that customers play a key role in driving new ideas and innovation
• Provide CIOs with access to experts and expertise across IBM and its partner ecosystem
• Work with CIOs to share success stories that demonstrate business value with CIO contribution

Each of these objectives responds directly to one or more of the things that executives value most. It's difficult to succeed with any community initiative if you don't focus first on providing relevant value to would-be participants. It's doubly difficult with the busiest and most sought-after executives.

To make it work, IBM has developed a tiered program, with three distinct initiatives:

1. Board of Advisors (20-25 CIOs). This is the most strategic of the three, and involves IBM's top executives as peers with CIOs from their most important clients. The primary focus is on providing advice to IBM on the company's strategic direction, something that the participating CIOs have great interest in given their enormous stake in IBM's success.
2. CIO Leadership Exchange (200+ CIOs). Initially an annual event, IBM is working to build more of an ongoing community with this larger group of CIOs from top global companies. The focus here is on sharing of best practices and success stories within a highly accomplished peer group of technology leaders.
3. Center for CIO Leadership (2,000+ CIOs). Focused on advancing the profession, this mission-driven organization, for which IBM provides lead sponsorship, emphasizes the development of leadership skills for current and future CIOs 

The tiered approach helps in organizing IBM resources and responding to different types of CIOs with different levels of relationship to IBM. Underlying each of these programs, though, is a consistent focus on delivering the value that executive participants demand:

• If CIOs want to engage with peers and extend their networks, make sure to prioritize peer exchange and access to experts in every aspect of community and program design
• If CIOs want to influence the direction of your organization, make sure to empower them and allow them to do this, even if it means listening to dissenting views
• If CIOs want to justify their business direction and intuition, create serious opportunities for collaboration and dialogue, along with providing relevant research and perspective
• If CIOs want to share best practices and success stories, ensure a private and safe environment to enable them to do this with relevant and credible peers

It's not rocket science, but it's not easy either. It means letting go of the desire to pitch and sell, and committing to the hard work of listening, facilitation, and collaboration. It means having the patience to emphasize the longer term benefits at some potential expense to short-term gain. Most of all, it means truly putting customer interests first, something we all talk about but all too often fail to deliver.   

Words and meaning: The power of alignment

Suzanne Lowe from Expertise Marketing has a great piece in her June newsletter on the importance of developing a common lexicon for marketing and business development in professional service firms. 

Pointing to common misunderstandings between business leaders and partners, on the one hand, and marketers and business developers on the other, about such basic terms as "return on investment," Lowe suggests that PS firms would be well served by investing some time in building common understanding. 

Most important, she says, is defining marketing and business development "up" to a more expansive and strategic view: 

For example, why should the term "marketing only connote the limited activities of, let's say, "building awareness," or "sales support?" Shouldn't the term "marketing be understood to also include targeting and segmentation? Pricing? Client loyalty? In many professional firms, marketing does not mean these latter terms, only the former.

To which I can only say, Amen.

It's not just professional service firms, of course. Many of the technology firms I work with suffer from the same problems: confusion over key terms and meanings, and a general defining "down" of what marketing is all about. And now that we're all trying to sort out the tangled terms of Web 2.0/social media/social networking/social web/marketing 2.0, the language problem is only getting worse.

But all is not lost, and Lowe is right to suggest that lexiconical alignment (if there is such a phrase!) can be a powerful force. 

Just consider the confusion around the word "solutions." If marketing is often misunderstood, the "S" word is subject to near-universal confusion. For companies that have taken the time to work through a solutions lexicon and taxonomy, however, the benefits have been substantial. 

My old company ITSMA has been in the forefront of this work in the IT sector, and my colleagues and I at Solutions Insights have continued to work with clients in similar fashion. In a great many cases, progress on the real work of bringing new offerings to market, sharpening marketing messaging to emphasize strategic business problems rather than product features and functions, and reorienting sales forces to sell integrated business "solutions" could only happen after all the relevant stakeholders agreed on a common language.

As it has been with solutions, so it can be with "marketing." In Lowe's own words, "New understandings of terms will foster practitioners' ability to grow the 'right' revenues, gain meaningful market share, and optimally serve clients."

What do you think?

Photo credit: greebile

Cisco's big think approach to emerging markets

For years, technology companies have tried to move up the value chain by promoting big ideas that would drive sales of premium business solutions rather than commodity products and services. It certainly makes sense, and some firms do it pretty well, but it's easier said than done.

Cisco, according to BusinessWeek, is now trying to move WAY up the value chain, looking to design whole cities, among other "projects" in emerging markets such as Saudi Arabia, Brazil, and Chile.

"Cisco isn't just selling technology. [SVP Paul] Mountford's pitch is that Cisco, more than any other company, can help countries such as Saudi Arabia modernize their economies and become leaders in the Internet Age. The company argues that, by investing in the Internet infrastructure Cisco sells, these governments can better educate their citizens, improve health care, and boost national productivity. They may even be able to create their own tech sectors, giving citizens the opportunity to become  well-paid 'knowledge workers like those in Bangalore or Guangdong, China."

The effort, as tech marketing guru Geoffrey Moore explains, "is getting itself designed into the fabric of these countries' economic plans, because Cisco is helping their leaders imagine the future." 

Pretty ambitious, to say the least. And extremely challenging, as BusinessWeek also notes, given the economic slowdown, intense competition from Cisco rivals, and the tremendous internal demands it places on Cisco's own experts to actually live up to the hype and deliver the goods.

But I think the time is right. For one thing, industry leaders like Cisco need to be bold in finding new markets to maintain their momentum. For another, as I wrote recently about IBM's Smarter Planet initiative, attaching ourselves in an authentic way to causes larger than ourselves (or companies) may well be the most effective way to go to market in this time of great change.

What do you think?

IBM, Obama, and marketing with a mission

Sam Palmisano, IBM's CEO, went to the Council on Foreign Relations this morning to lay out an ambitious program of technology-driven social change and economic recovery. IBM's "Smarter Planet" initiative is a seriously big idea; in Palmisano's words, it's about "infusing intelligence into the way the world literally works—the systems and processes that enable physical goods to be developed, manufactured, bought and sold… services to be delivered… everything from people and money to oil, water and electrons to move… and billions of people to work and live."

Practically speaking, this means investing heavily in technology-based systems and processes to address fundamental global challenges such as energy waste, transportation gridlock, supply chain inefficiency, water shortages, antiquated health care systems, and, perhaps most urgent right now, unmonitored and out of control financial markets.

The initiative is of course self-serving. The more governments invest in technology-based solutions, the more industry leaders like IBM stand to gain. But self-serving doesn't mean it's wrong. In fact, I'd like to suggest that this is actually the best kind of marketing, and the kind that we need to be emphasizing right now:

• It's mission-driven, focused on applying business know-how to clearly felt social problems
• It's inspirational, inviting people to think big
• It's provocative, challenging people to debate the premise, the approach, and potential alternatives
• It's solution-oriented, looking more toward designing sophisticated solutions than pitching specific products or services
• It's believable, because IBM has done the research, is already investing heavily in green technology and services, and has credible offers and capabilities to address at least some of the problems.

My main point here is not to praise IBM, although obviously I do think the effort is praiseworthy. IBM is far from a perfect company and other firms are doing similarly valuable work in these areas. Rather, it's to raise the question about how we go to market in this difficult time.

Most of the marketers I talk to these days are shortening their time horizons, shifting resources (to the extent they still have them) toward lead generation, and doing whatever possible to accelerate immediate sales. This is understandable, and yet...

We've just completed a remarkable election in the US in which a majority of Americans chose a candidate who stared calmly at enormous problems facing our country and the world and said now is the time to think big, to set our sights high, and to be the change. Self-serving? Of course. But it also excited and inspired and mobilized millions of people previously too cynical or disengaged to actually believe that getting involved could make a difference.

Marketing candidates is clearly different than marketing business services and solutions. But exciting and inspiring cynical and disengaged people is actually a pretty good description of the challenge we business marketers are facing right now too.

Palmisano summed it up nicely this morning: "Over the next couple of years, there will be winners, and there will be losers. And though it may not be easy to see now, I believe we will see new leaders emerge who win not by surviving the storm, but by changing the game."

Doing the right thing: Three quick thoughts

Not to be all doom and gloom or anything, but it's hard to talk to folks these days and not get caught up in the economic anxiety and client pullbacks that everyone is dealing with. In that context, three quick thoughts on doing the right thing:

• For clients: It's even more important now to go the extra mile to help out, even if this means advising them to cut back with you or look elsewhere for help. Seth Godin's blog today uses a shoe store story to illustrate the point: If you don't have the right size for a customer, help him find a store that does even if it is a competitor. Pushing him toward the wrong size will only backfire, and helping him out will generate the good will, stories, and referrals that we all need to succeed.
• For prospects: Run fast from any marketing tactic that suggests the barest hint of deception. Buyers in a bad mood jump even faster on attempts to fool them, and have more energy to spread the bad word -- which is then amplified by the online watchdogs. A recent MarketingProfs newsletter tells the tale of how Stokefire, a naming company, sniffed out deceptive blogging practices from a new competitor, blew the whistle, and watched the ensuing storm. As Tate Linden of Stokefire notes, "your brand is who you are when you think no one is looking." If you wouldn't be proud to have the tactic highlighted publicly to prospects and clients alike, don't do it!
• For employees: Communicate openly and aggressively about what's happening with the business, including possible layoffs or other cutbacks. Everyone is talking about it anyway, so being especially transparent lessens the rumor mill and inspires a bit more trust in company leadership. Communications coach Carmine Gallo recalls his own bad experience after 9/11 as a useful intro to some helpful tips in BusinessWeek. To which I would only add that how you deal with any required layoffs is equally critical. Your former colleagues will tell their stories far and wide as soon as they are laid off; stories of honesty, integrity, and fairness are obviously more helpful, or at least less destructive.

It's easy to let the daily struggle overwhelm our knowledge of what's really right. But much as we'll personally regret any "wrong thing" shortcuts in the days and months to come, we're all too likely to suffer the direct business consequences as well.

Marketing after the meltdown

Seven years ago, I published an essay on "marketing priorities after September 11." The financial meltdown is obviously different than the terrorist attacks, but both have created a powerful combination of real economic downturn with deep social and psychological anxiety. Now, as then, the ways that companies respond will matter greatly to their chances for weathering the storm.

Looking ahead, it strikes me that the four guideposts I outlined back in September 2001 are just as relevant today.

Business Value. Clients and prospects facing an even tougher economy will only consider solutions that clearly deliver value. We need to review value propositions and emphasize measurable business value to specific clients in specific industries facing specific economic conditions....

Relationships. A more cautious psychological as well as economic climate will likely put an even greater premium on trusted relationships. We should shift more marketing resources toward existing clients and partners. Many will want to circle the wagons with existing providers, thereby creating good opportunities for deeper client engagements.... By the same token, failures to go the extra mile for existing clients will be even more noticeable than usual. Prospects, meanwhile, are less likely to cast a wide net for new providers. Short lists will get shorter and more difficult for newcomers to penetrate.

Communication. Marketers wisely made immediate and extensive communication, internally and externally, a top priority on September 11 and after. It was critical to touch base, offer condolences and assistance, and reassure friends, colleagues, and partners wherever possible. We should continue with a heightened level of communications to help assuage all the obvious concerns in the days and months ahead.... And we would be well served to keep as much of our real, human voices in this effort as possible. One of the most heartening aspects of any disaster is the way in which pretense is dropped. If we can now move forward with less marketing-speak and more human-speak we'll all be better served.

Community. Crises are moments of truth. With little time and much pressure, corporate reactions generally reflect the organization's core values. The wonderful response to September 11 from our industry was a reminder that the community impulse was not just a passing fancy of the late 90s boom. That impulse is likely to gain more importance in the months and years ahead as employees, clients, and other stakeholders seek trusted partners in an increasingly challenging economic and political environment. Building on current relief efforts with a stronger commitment to corporate ethics, social responsibility, and community engagement - and honestly communicating the implementation of that commitment—should therefore yield substantial dividends in terms of loyalty and professional credibility.

One of the first impulses many companies have in the face of economic crisis is simply to cut back on marketing as an "easy" way to reduce costs. In some cases this may be necessary, although I certainly believe it should be a last resort given the marketing's central role in reassuring customers and finding new sources of revenue.

More important, though, is what marketing actually does in times like these, at whatever level of funding. As I wrote back in 2001: "The old rules of marketing are certainly not irrelevant, and the guideposts noted above would be useful anytime. Now, however, the social and psychological impacts of the attacks in the U.S. suggest that a more personal, human-scale, and community-minded approach to marketing will become critical to success." If the meltdown pushes marketing further in this direction, we can at least consider that the storm cloud of the current crisis may have a silver lining.