I've always been a big fan of cause-related marketing, so perked right up when I saw mention of Patagonia's new Vote the Environment campaign (see also here, here, and here) The premium outdoor clothing dealer has always put a strong environmental sensibility at the center of the business, but typically has marketed itself to the over-30 crowd. In a new push at younger consumers, Patagonia is taking a strong cause-related approach and the campaign deserves mention for several reasons.
First, of course, it's true to the brand. Lots of companies attach themselves to worthy causes (in this case, getting young people to vote in the upcoming US elections and providing them with information about environmental issues), but it's difficult to do this well if you don't have a credible record and story about the cause to begin with.
Second, it's a nicely integrated campaign, geared appropriately to the audience -- combining traditional advertising, Web presence, and in-store promotion with youth-oriented social media initiatives on YouTube, Facebook, MySpace, blogs and other relevant platforms.
Third, it puts useful and interesting content way above promotion. Pushing product in all the right places for the audience might sell a few more items near-term. But getting people engaged in the issues as brought to you by an enlightened sponsor is far more likely to build buzz, enhance reputation and pave the way for more substantial sales a bit later on.
Finally, the company is taking a stand that may be controversial among some customers, partners, or other stakeholders. It's easy to shy away from controversy as a business, but, if done well, the benefits of standing out from the crowd and giving your advocates more reason to spread the good word can more than outweigh the potential downside.
Recent Comments