Almost four years ago, AdAge's Bob Garfield wrote a brilliant article on "the marketing industry's coming disaster." Garfield's "chaos scenario" suggested that the digital revolution was surely upon us, but would wreak havoc for years as the old order collapsed, companies made the transition, and agencies struggled to keep up with the demand for new talent and solutions to implement the emerging digital approaches.
Among clients, social media is lukewarm. Many attendees were surprised, as was I, when my quickie poll from the podium about what kinds of people were in the audience yielded only three or four clients in a room of roughly 300. Agency people made up the vast majority of attendees. Even if my poll allows for some clients not raising their hands -- so as not to be attacked by agencies who want their business all day -- it makes you wonder if agencies have drunk the Kool-Aid, while marketers may not even know it's being served.
I wasn't at that event, but have had the same experience and reaction to all sorts of other events on social media and marketing during the last few years. Supply side economics was all the rage back in the 1980s with the Reagan Administration; build it and they will come. It worked pretty well for Kevin Costner in Field of Dreams, but not so well in real life.

I really enjoyed this post Rob. That creeping sense that all the experts are talking to each other, not customers, is a classic trough-of-disillusionment situation. I remember feeling it for the first time in the 'AI Winter' (that dates me!). It will pass. There are 4 important factors that move a technology from this phase firmly onto the slope of enlightenment: performance, penetration, integration, and payback. Of these, social media performance and penetration are progressing fine I think – probably much faster than many previous technology waves of a similar scale. It’s the other two that will need work. We don't yet fully understand how to integrate social media into the mix and to hook it into some of the other processes of the firm. For example I wonder how many corporate dashboards have social media metrics included at this point in time - very few probably. I don't suppose many conventional corporate execs discuss how their blogs are doing in the weekly ops meeting.
Then there is the question of generating and measuring financial return in a clear, standardized and repeatable way. That is still challenging many of the web 2.0 startups. But then - it challenged Alta Vista once, and eventually (via others on the way) Google solved it for search.
We think it will take one to two years for Web 2.0 to pass through the trough phase of the hype cycle, but that's actually pretty quick for something so substantial.
Posted by: Mark Raskino | Jan 30, 2009 at 03:54 AM
Thanks Mark, all great points. Your four factors are a useful guide, and I agree that we're farther along with performance and penetration -- perhaps because so much of the effort (especially at larger companies) has come from the grassroots, which folks are less able and often less interested to address integration and payback. And perhaps just because integration and payback are more difficult!
I actually don't think we're seeing a reversal in spending at all, but rather a steady increase that is just less exponential than the number of people chasing it for work.
I, too, have full faith that we'll get there, but the combination of general impatience among the cognoscenti, the continuing rise of free agent nation, the anxiety among agencies to make the transition, and the nature of the new tools themselves are making this trough a particularly public one! I agree it's relatively quick in the larger scheme of things, and probably within a few years we won't be talking about "social media" at all, just media (and marketing, communications, etc.).
Posted by: Rob Leavitt | Jan 30, 2009 at 08:47 AM