IBM, Obama, and marketing with a mission

Sam Palmisano, IBM's CEO, went to the Council on Foreign Relations this morning to lay out an ambitious program of technology-driven social change and economic recovery. IBM's "Smarter Planet" initiative is a seriously big idea; in Palmisano's words, it's about "infusing intelligence into the way the world literally works—the systems and processes that enable physical goods to be developed, manufactured, bought and sold… services to be delivered… everything from people and money to oil, water and electrons to move… and billions of people to work and live."

Practically speaking, this means investing heavily in technology-based systems and processes to address fundamental global challenges such as energy waste, transportation gridlock, supply chain inefficiency, water shortages, antiquated health care systems, and, perhaps most urgent right now, unmonitored and out of control financial markets.

The initiative is of course self-serving. The more governments invest in technology-based solutions, the more industry leaders like IBM stand to gain. But self-serving doesn't mean it's wrong. In fact, I'd like to suggest that this is actually the best kind of marketing, and the kind that we need to be emphasizing right now:

• It's mission-driven, focused on applying business know-how to clearly felt social problems
• It's inspirational, inviting people to think big
• It's provocative, challenging people to debate the premise, the approach, and potential alternatives
• It's solution-oriented, looking more toward designing sophisticated solutions than pitching specific products or services
• It's believable, because IBM has done the research, is already investing heavily in green technology and services, and has credible offers and capabilities to address at least some of the problems.

My main point here is not to praise IBM, although obviously I do think the effort is praiseworthy. IBM is far from a perfect company and other firms are doing similarly valuable work in these areas. Rather, it's to raise the question about how we go to market in this difficult time.

Most of the marketers I talk to these days are shortening their time horizons, shifting resources (to the extent they still have them) toward lead generation, and doing whatever possible to accelerate immediate sales. This is understandable, and yet...

We've just completed a remarkable election in the US in which a majority of Americans chose a candidate who stared calmly at enormous problems facing our country and the world and said now is the time to think big, to set our sights high, and to be the change. Self-serving? Of course. But it also excited and inspired and mobilized millions of people previously too cynical or disengaged to actually believe that getting involved could make a difference.

Marketing candidates is clearly different than marketing business services and solutions. But exciting and inspiring cynical and disengaged people is actually a pretty good description of the challenge we business marketers are facing right now too.

Palmisano summed it up nicely this morning: "Over the next couple of years, there will be winners, and there will be losers. And though it may not be easy to see now, I believe we will see new leaders emerge who win not by surviving the storm, but by changing the game."

Comments

[Used Refurbished Laptops]

Placed an online order and received an immediate confirmation. From that point had no communications until two full weeks later when I received an email cancelling my order and offering to sell me the same item at roughly 9X the original price. There really is no excuse for a two week delay.